Lore talk:Almalexia (city)

The UESPWiki – Your source for The Elder Scrolls since 1995
Jump to: navigation, search

Reddit Source[edit]

While it's nice to finally hear an explanation for this, the source really is sub-optimal. Not only is it an archived reddit AMA, but the answer given is not even particularly accurate (i.e. implying that we see the city of Almalexia in Tribunal). While I'd like to roll with the explanation, I think we should still treat this source the same as other, less reputable OOG references. (Just to clarify, I think the current page revision is fine as-is.) —Legoless (talk) 12:46, 24 October 2014 (GMT)

By "current" you mean before or after adding this info? -Vordur Steel-Hammer2 (talk) 17:46, 24 October 2014 (GMT)
After. I'm just kind of pre-emptively bringing this up in case of a merge proposal or something. —Legoless (talk) 18:46, 24 October 2014 (GMT)
Ok. Also notice that the question about Mournhold/Almalexia was brought up and answered twice in the source. -Vordur Steel-Hammer2 (talk) 19:25, 24 October 2014 (GMT)

Merge with Lore:Mournhold[edit]

As the use of Almalexia as name of the city is something that came and went (and the name of Mournhold still being used on a major part of the city during that time), it does seem more fit to use Lore:Almalexia as a redirect to Lore:Mournhold page, or possibly to a section of that page, I think. —MortenOSlash (talk) 11:06, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

I know I'm a little late to the party, but I would support a merge for the same reasons. Almalexia amounts to a phase of Mournhold's history, there's not enough difference between the two to really justify separate articles. Croaker (talk) 06:21, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Sounds reasonable to me. Since it appears to be my rewrite for the LPP that prompted the proposal in the first place, I'd be happy to make the merge myself. --Enodoc (talk) 08:07, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Merge away, unless someone else wants to chime in. Croaker (talk) 08:14, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Since there's been no opposition to this, I've gone ahead with the merge. --Enodoc (talk) 22:34, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
It seemed like the only logical solution to me. —MortenOSlash (talk) 05:47, 16 August 2016 (UTC)