UESPWiki talk:Deletion Review/Arena:Save Games

Status

My understanding of Deletion Review is that these articles are here for one week/seven days, so my question is this: this article's deletion review is over now, right? It's 01:08, 7 November 2014 GMT/UTC, which is what the wiki goes by, and this article was put up for deletion-review on 23:08, 30 October 2014 GMT/UTC, thus has been more than seven days since being put up for deletion-review. --Gandoril The Spell-Binder (talk) 01:08, 7 November 2014 (GMT)

The time is up, but I don't see a problem in waiting for a little more input. We haven't really reached a discernible consensus. —Legoless (talk) 01:12, 7 November 2014 (GMT)

Well, we have now. Unfotunately, it's 'merge and redirect.' I can live with it, as I can see the logic of merging the page in question with Arena:Files, but I was hoping to keep them separate. I'm going to post a comment for the latest poster, so that (s)he knows that the original uploaders of the first two files probably don't exist anymore, seeing as how the links come from the old UESP web-site. Oh, and thanks for the title bar; I had no idea how to create one without first going through the 'add new section' link, but now I do. Again, thank you!

P.S.: We still waiting? It seems to me that most feel that the page in question should be merged with Arena:Files, making the current score 2-1-1-1, with the others being my 'keep', Spweasel's 'merge, redirect, and userfy', and Damon's 'delete' (I assume that's what he's getting at, unless he's not actually voting, just putting facts forward).

P.P.S.: Spweasel, if you see this, please disregard my earlier comment; the two saves from the old site are Daveh's, per Damon's opening comment; that was my mistake, so userfying should be fine, since, of course, Daveh has an account, and the third one was uploaded by a current user. --Gandoril The Spell-Binder (talk) 13:29, 7 November 2014 (GMT)

Gandoril, please be patient. Four votes isn't exactly clear consensus, so yes, we're still waiting. Not everything on the site has a strict timetable (look at the Featured Articles, for example, we've been due for a new one for over a week. We just haven't had any nominations to replace it). Also, if you forget to sign a comment and someone puts an unsigned template on it, there's no need for you to go back and re-sign the comment. It's there so we know exactly when and re-signing it later makes the timestamp when you re-signed it, not when the comment was initially posted. It's not a huge deal, we all do it on occasion. •WoahBro^►talk 14:35, 7 November 2014 (GMT)

FWIW, Gandoril, you actually were (at least partially) right - I hunted down the original UESP web page and two of the three saves on it are attributed to readers... complete with the uploaders' email addresses. --spweasel, the uncapitalized (talk) 15:34, 7 November 2014 (GMT)