User talk:204.45.58.234

Elliot's comment

Those 2 have a history. It was a insult aimed at Rpeh there is no doubt there and i think it is better if everyone stayed out of it and let an admin decide on what to do. I really don't want to start an edit-war with you so please leave it and someone with a higher understanding of the matter than us will revise as appropriate. I am saying this to keep us both out of trouble and all the crap that goes on here.--Corevette789 16:56, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

So you think it's a good idea to leave a message that you agree is insulting on the site? That's an absurd position to take. 204.45.58.234 16:59, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

I don't think it's a good idea to get involved. That's all I have nothing against you or anything like that. :) leave it to someone who knows what has happened. --Corevette789 17:03, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

I am not going to get in an edit-war with you, wicth is what you are doing. Ill send GK a message later on the subject and she can decide where it should go. For now, as I see you will not give up in this, it will stay deleted.--Corevette789 17:05, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Elliot has put his insult back again. I have to leave it there since I am not going to violate the Three Revert Rule. I still do not see why he should be allowed to conduct himself in this manner. 204.45.58.234 17:24, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Who are you again? –Elliot ^talk 17:32, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Anonymous editors are permitted to edit this site. I am taking advantage of that. Do not try to invade my privacy. 204.45.58.234 17:45, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

I am just interested to see why your first edit was to remove my comment. And you know a lot of things for being an anonymous editor. Quite intriguing. –Elliot ^talk 17:53, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Okay, Both of you stop right now. Elliot that was a clear sign you were accusing him of being Rpeh. I do visit UESPWacth. If I could administer blocks both of you would get one because you are both filling up the RC page like crazy with the help of me, of course. Stop until an Admin comes online and can decide the matter in their own hands. For now, I see you are not going to stop go to the IRC chatroom.--Corevette789 17:58, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Sigh, you are the one accusing him of being rpeh. More people are on this site than just him you know. –Elliot ^talk 18:02, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Edits

I've leafed through some of your edits and I would to assure you that I don't think they were edit-warring. Don't worry, the warning was ill-placed in my opinion.

Unfortunately I can't give permission to remove it, only the person who imposed the warning or an administrator can give permission to remove it, don't worry, we'll have everything under control soon enough. --ModderElGrande 18:52, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

I support this warning being removed for the same reason Timenn posted Elliot's should be removed.--Corevette789 18:56, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

I would like to point out to both of you that this editor is using an open proxy (per Google search), which casts him/her in a suspicious light. --Timenn-<talk> 19:04, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Which warrants an immediate block--Corevette789 19:05, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Exactly Corvette! Maybe Elliot wasn't fully at fault after all... --ModderElGrande 19:06, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Timmen needs to administer it sadly we do not have the ability.--Corevette789 19:07, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Yeah. We can put up a block notice, but that is just a notice, and won't block the user. --ModderElGrande 19:08, 6 March 2010 (UTC)